Science curator; resigned.

Synopsis and Conclusions

UFOs versus proof for the UFO ETH - there is no supreme smoking firearm - yet. I'd be the first to recognize that. I'd propose however this is an instance of where there's smoke, there's smoke. The flame has yet to be seen through the smoke. There however must be something suggestive about the way of that smoke to drive bunches of individuals, even some very keen individuals, to acknowledge the likelihood, some say likelihood, of the UFO ETH. I mean the thought simply didn't pop out of the ether - out of nowhere. Something exceptionally suggestive is driving it.

However, there is a reason. There's all that anyone could need onlooker affirmation and physical proof that would fulfill any official courtroom; any judge; any jury in pretty much some other arrangement of circumstances to render a decision of blameworthy. In any case, the UFO ETH can not yet be rendered liable, in light of the fact that however there's not yet to date that smoking weapon. There's loads of confirmation - no verification. There's no supreme under-the-magnifying lens, on the lab's piece, confirmation positive of the UFO ETH. In the event that any UFO ETH buff says they have confirmation, doubters ought to instruct them to 'set up or quiets down'. On the off chance that anyway they say they have proof for the UFO ETH, ask them respectfully what it is.

Science curator; resigned.

History Channel Documentary