At last the inquiry here comes down

So there is by all accounts a twofold standard for satisfactory proof here. UFOs have clearly no obvious proof and a 'chuckle component'; ball lightning and TLP have unverifiable confirmation however no 'snicker variable', yet these have hypothetical underpinnings that make their presence conceivable. On account of the UFO ETH, it's the Fermi Paradox - that is the 'where are they, in the event that they exist they ought to be here' perception.

At last the inquiry here comes down to finding an answer (a smoking weapon) to the inquiry that people have approached and theorized on for a large number of years - would we say we are separated from everyone else in the universe? There shouldn't be any twofold norms utilized when it comes down to tending to this issue. There are at last four decisions: 1) We can pick not to answer the inquiry on the grounds that the world has greater needs than demonstrating the presence of 'minimal green men'; 2) we can, as SETI searches, out there, which clearly is an extremely consistent thing to do despite the fact that it's a notorious 'needle in the sheaf' seek; 3) we can look down here - antiquated space travelers and UFOs - which is a positive in that it limits the pile's geology required to be inspected, yet on likelihood is more outlandish factually that the needle will be there (another parallel being somebody searching for a lost key underneath the lamppost on the grounds that the light's better there); 4) or we can do both - seek out there AND look down here and not put our journey for the 'minimal green men' into an either/or wicker container. Sadly, that is much excessively hopeful a position, making it impossible to have acknowledged given the verifiable twofold standard officially taken.

History Channel Documentary