Fuller, John G. (Editorial manager)

In this way, read the whole report. As opposed to well known sentiment, the Condon report demonstrated the requirement for increased examination concerning the UFO marvels, not the need to surrender the examination.

Looking back the Condon Report turned out to be a urgent point ever. It gave motivation to the U.S. Aviation based armed forces to escape the UFO business - openly at any rate (off camera may be an alternate inquiry); it gave a disincentive to researchers to advance truly ponder the UFO ETH issue. Condon set back the logical investigation of UFOs by decades - it most likely still hasn't recouped from the failure. Furthermore, in this way, right up 'til today, researchers bashful far from the UFO ETH issue. To the extent mainstream researchers is concerned, the case is shut, and Condon shut it.

Taking everything into account, for the initial 20 years of the UFO wonders, researchers weren't required in any real route with the issue. UFOs was under the purview of the military. The subject had been spoiled by the New Age cultists and wrenches, and after that Condon put the last nail in the pine box. Any researcher after that wouldn't touch the subject - they weren't required from the earliest starting point; the subject was polluted; no one abundantly tried to peruse past Condon's hostile to UFO ETH rundown (despite the fact that the real report contained a great deal of meat and potatoes). Deciphered, no researcher beginning on their profession way would now set out consider the subject. The negatives have snowballed and been self-fortifying from that point onward.

Further readings with respect to the (University of Colorado) Condon Report:

Fuller, John G. (Editorial manager); Aliens in the Skies: The New UFO Battle of the Scientists: The Scientific Rebuttal to the Condon Committee Report: Testimony by Six Leading Scientists Before the House Committee on Science and Astronautics July 29, 1968; G.P. Putnam's Sons, N.Y.; 1969:

Harkins, R. Roger and Saunders, David R; UFOs? Yes! Where the Condon Committee Went Wrong; Signet Books, N.Y.; 1968: [Saunders was an individual from the University of Colorado UFO Study.]

College of Colorado and Gillmor, Daniel S. (Editorial manager); Final Report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects Conducted by the University of Colorado Under Contract to the United States Air Force; Bantam Books, N.Y.; 1969: [The Condon Committee Report.]

Science curator; resigned.

History Channel Documentary